ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Semantic Content of Visual Consequent Stimuli Modulates Audiovisual Learning in Migraine.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAcquired equivalence learning relies on associating different antecedent stimuli with shared outcomes and is mediated by the basal ganglia and hippocampus. Audiovisual associative learning benefits from multisensory integration, which may be disrupted in migraine. Previous studies indicated altered performance in such learning paradigms. This study investigated whether the semantic content of consequent visual stimuli influence audiovisual associative equivalence learning in adult migraine patients.
methods30 adult migraine patients completed two audiovisual learning tests: the SoundFace test (cartoon faces as visual consequents) and the SoundPolygon test (simple geometric shapes). Both used the same four auditory antecedents. Participants completed acquisition with feedback, retrieval of learned associations, and generalization to novel stimulus combinations. Performance was assessed by the number of trials required to learn, error ratios during each phase, and average response times.
resultsPatients performed significantly better in the SoundFace test than in the SoundPolygon test. They required fewer acquisition trials, committed fewer errors across all phases, and showed shorter reaction times. No significant differences were observed between migraine patients and controls in the SoundPolygon test.
conclusionSimpler visual consequents elicited reduced audiovisual learning performance in patients, consistent with a previous control study. However, no impaired learning performance was found relative to controls when reduced visual consequents were applied. Migraine patients outperformed controls in the SoundFace test previously. These findings suggest that while reduced semantic content impairs audiovisual learning, migraine patients show preserved performance compared to controls. The results may reflect compensatory mechanisms preserving cognitive function in migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.