ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
A survey of medical student education in dementia and delirium in Europe.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeKnowledge of dementia and delirium is essential for all clinicians. This survey aims to map the teaching of these two topics in European medical school curricula, in terms of content, linked learning, and pedagogical approach.
methodsA bespoke online survey was circulated to educators within universities providing medical student programmes (direct entry or graduate entry) across Europe, championed by the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) Special Interest Group members and contacts sourced through institutions' websites. Responses (2024-2025) were limited to one per course.
resultsThe final dataset comprised 64 courses across 62 universities, from 17 countries. Dementia and delirium featured in 95% of curricula, taught separately in about half of instances. Typical teaching time was 3-4 h for dementia and 1-2 h for delirium, concentrated in later course years, and mainly involving geriatricians. Fewer than one-in-four courses incorporated interprofessional learning, most commonly with nursing; involving people with lived experience was rare. Young-onset dementia and decision-making capacity and supports were absent in > 25% of courses, while medications for cognitive and non-cognitive symptoms of dementia were absent in 19% and 13%, respectively. Content gaps for both dementia and delirium included local or national guidelines, communication strategies, and environmental design. Patient-student interaction in the clinical environment pre-graduation was not universal (72-73%), with gaps reported in nine countries.
conclusionWhile dementia and delirium are broadly included in participating European institutions' medical student curricula, limited teaching time, infrequent interprofessional and experiential learning, and significant content gaps highlight the need for greater consistency and comprehensiveness to meet future healthcare needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42625119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.