SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Intrathecal immune checkpoint inhibitors as adjunctive therapy for leptomeningeal disease: A case series and systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are promising for leptomeningeal disease (LMD), but systemic delivery is limited by poor cerebrospinal fluid penetration and treatment-related toxicity. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of adjunctive intrathecal (IT) ICI therapy compared with systemic ICI alone. We report two institutional cases of melanoma-associated LMD treated with IT ICI alongside systemic therapy. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically reviewed, identifying 28 eligible studies consisting of case reports, small series, and early phase trials. Of 542 patients screened, 201 received ICI therapy: 161 systemic ICI alone and 40 IT ICI with concurrent systemic therapy. Patient-level and aggregate data were extracted to compare adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory time- and dose-adjusted analyses accounted for differences in treatment exposure. IT ICI therapy demonstrated a favorable safety profile. At the patient level, adjunct IT delivery was associated with a non-significant trend toward reduced grade ≥ 3 AE risk (RR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.22-1.13; p = 0.096). At the event level, adjunct IT therapy was significantly associated with 72% fewer grade ≥ 3 AEs per patient (rate ratio 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.64; p = 0.003). Dose-adjusted meta-regression suggested cumulative exposure did not explain these differences. No significant differences were observed in PFS or OS after multivariable adjustment. Adjunct IT ICI therapy was not associated with increased adverse event risk or high-grade toxicity burden compared with systemic ICI alone, supporting its feasibility as an adjunctive therapeutic strategy for LMD that warrants prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.