ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Global variation in acquisition costs of single-use flexible ureteroscopes and flexible navigable access sheaths: an international collaborative analysis from the YAU & EAU Endourology groups.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimal duration of pre-stenting before RIRS: a prospective randomized study evaluating FANS-UAS placement success.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveEndourological practice increasingly depends on single-use devices, whose costs vary considerably across regions and health care systems. Flexible single use ureteroscopes (URS) and flexible and navigable sheaths (FANS) represent a major component of ureteroscopy-related expenditure. This study aimed to evaluate international variation in purchase and device-related acquisition cost of URS, FANS, and the cost of FANS (suction) assisted URS (URS and FANS).
methodsAn international collaborative dataset compiled by the EAU Endourology Group collected information on device purchase prices for single use flexible ureteroscopes, FANS, and suction assisted URS across multiple countries. All costs were converted to Euros (€). Countries were stratified into quartiles, and global medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) were reported.
resultsData were obtained from 40 countries across Europe, Asia, North and South America, and the Middle East, and showed a significant global cost variation. The median price of single-use FURS was €676.7 (IQR 579-975), ranging from €310 (Romania) to €1638 (Cyprus), while FANS cost €180 (IQR 130-226), ranging from €36 to €400. Median per-procedure FANS assisted URS cost was €951.6 (range €415-1881). Lowest costs were observed in Romania, Belgium, and Germany, while highest were in Cyprus, Russia, and the United States, with up to four-fold inter-country variation, including within Europe.
conclusionsSubstantial global variability exists in the cost of URS and FANS, influenced by healthcare policy, and economic conditions. These findings highlight the need for cost-effectiveness analyses and the development of evidence-based procurement policies to promote sustainability and equitable access in endourological practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42625061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.