ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2026
Caring for the lonely: an ethical case for social prescribing against loneliness.
Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social prescribing to mitigate loneliness has been gaining traction worldwide in the past two decades. Patients found to be lonely by their clinicians are linked with social services and are encouraged to engage in non-clinical, social activities such as painting and music classes, Tai Chi, outdoor excursions etc. The science grounding the cost-effectiveness of these interventions, however, has been scarce. From a justice perspective which prioritizes resource allocation based on desired outcomes, social prescribing may be hard to justify. Care ethics, however, may be more adept at justifying and indeed compelling the investment of limited public resources in social prescription activities aimed at reducing loneliness. The assumption is that individuals have an entitlement to such activities first because they have a right to health, and second because, as inherently social creatures, they have a right to not be lonely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.