Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42624982›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

A quasi-experimental study of abortion rates following gestational age limit changes in Japan.

Yuko Yanagawa, Aurelie Piedvache, Yusuke Okubo, Naho Morisaki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuko YanagawaDepartment of Social Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Aurelie PiedvacheDepartment of Social Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2737-0461
Yusuke OkuboDepartment of Social Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-2893
Naho MorisakiDepartment of Social Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. morisaki-n@ncchd.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6151-4513

Funding

MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 17K19868Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan) H28-ICT-ippan-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between of legislative changes in abortion regulations on women's decision-making remains understudied. In 1991, Japan reduced the gestational limit for abortion from 24 to 22 weeks of pregnancy. Here, using national data on abortions, stillbirths and live births at ≥12 weeks from 1989 to 1994 (n = 7,364,783), we examined the association of the change with abortion incidence rate and cumulative incidence between 12 and 27 weeks using quasi-experimental interrupted time-series and regression discontinuity analyses. After the change, incidence rates increased at 20 weeks (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.43) and 21 weeks (IRR 1.33, 95% CI, 1.18-1.50), while decreasing at 22 weeks (IRR 0.25, 95% CI, 0.21-0.30, P < 0.001) and 23 weeks (IRR 0.07, 95% CI, 0.06-0.10, P < 0.001), and no meaningful changes for ≤19 or ≥24 weeks. Cumulative incidence decreased only for women at 19-23 weeks. In conclusion, the legislative change shifted abortions to earlier gestational ages, and was associated with fewer abortions among women who had reached 19th week of pregnancy.

Identifiers

PMID42624982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.