ReviewOdontology2026
Digital complete dentures: clinical performance, fabrication methods, and occlusal considerations: a systematic review.
Review in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Digital denture fabrication represents a significant advancement in prosthodontics, offering enhanced precision and reproducibility compared with conventional techniques. The role of occlusal schemes in optimizing the clinical performance of digitally fabricated complete dentures remains an important area of investigation. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of digitally fabricated complete dentures and compare the outcomes associated with different fabrication methods, including CAD-CAM milling and 3D printing, relative to conventional denture fabrication techniques, while assessing the available evidence related to occlusal considerations in complete denture therapy.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD420251229805). Following screening and eligibility assessment, eight clinical studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. These comprised randomized controlled trials and comparative clinical studies evaluating CAD-CAM milled and 3D-printed complete dentures. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool for randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Outcomes assessed included denture fit, retention, occlusal performance, and patient satisfaction.
resultsThe included studies demonstrated that digital denture fabrication techniques provide improved or comparable clinical outcomes relative to conventional methods. Compared with conventionally fabricated complete dentures, digitally fabricated complete dentures demonstrated comparable or improved clinical outcomes. CAD-CAM milled dentures showed favorable denture base adaptation and retention, while CAD-CAM 3D-printed dentures offered potential advantages in customization and design flexibility. Most studies showed high methodological quality and low to moderate risk of bias. Patient satisfaction was generally higher with digitally fabricated dentures, likely due to improved fit, comfort, and reduced need for post-insertion adjustments. Digital workflows may offer improved control over denture design and occlusal relationships; however, direct evidence evaluating the influence of specific occlusal schemes on functional outcomes remains limited.
conclusionDigital denture fabrication demonstrates promising clinical outcomes with respect to denture fit, retention, and patient satisfaction. However, evidence regarding the influence of occlusal considerations remains limited. Nevertheless, the specific impact of different occlusal schemes within digital workflows remains insufficiently investigated. Further well-designed clinical studies are required to establish definitive evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42624972What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.