ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2026
Osteomimetic microcalcification shapes the breast tumor microenvironment and metastatic potential.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microcalcifications are among the most reliable mammographic signs of breast cancer, particularly of non-palpable and in situ disease, yet for decades they were regarded as inert by-products of cellular degeneration-a view that delayed inquiry into their biology. A growing body of in vitro, ex vivo, and tissue-based evidence now reframes breast microcalcification as a process that can be actively regulated and cell-driven, recapitulating physiological and pathological mineralization elsewhere in the body. In this review, we synthesize the mechanistic basis of this paradigm shift and argue that mineral formation is not a passive marker but a participant in tumor biology. Two mineral species-calcium oxalate and calcium hydroxyapatite-carry different biological meaning and are separable on routine histopathology by birefringence and histochemistry. Hydroxyapatite can promote proliferation, matrix remodeling, and invasion, yet it is also the mineral of most benign calcifications, so its significance lies in composition and cellular origin, not presence alone. We discuss the osteomimetic program through which mammary tumor cells acquire bone-like mineralizing capacity, including the roles of alkaline phosphatase activity, ion transport, and PI3K-Akt signaling, and we distinguish osteomimicry-a phenotype of the tumor cell-from the bone metastatic niche that such cells may exploit. We then consider how mineral composition and microstructure encode the surrounding microenvironment and connect to clinical observations: association with HER2-positive disease, behavior under neoadjuvant chemotherapy, prognostic associations, and an emerging link with bone metastasis. We close with an integrated framework and a research agenda positioning mineral biology at the interface of the tumor microenvironment and metastatic progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42624963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.