Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Effects of aromatherapy on chemotherapy-related symptom management.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAromatherapy holds promise for reducing chemotherapy-related symptoms, however, lacks robust clinical evidence. This study evaluates the feasibility and benefit of aromatherapy in managing chemotherapy-related symptoms.
methodsThis four-arm, randomized, blinded clinical trial enrolled 91 cancer patients (≥ 8 years) undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. Participants were randomized into one of four arms (lavender, jojoba, orange, and ginger) for two chemotherapy cycles (Baseline-no aromatherapy and Cycle 2 - aromatherapy) with an optional third cycle. Participants used aromatherapy inhalers at least 4 times/day for 7 days and rated severity of 7 symptoms (i.e., nausea, vomiting, pain, anxiety, fatigue, sleep difficulties, and lack of appetite) from 0 to 10 daily during each cycle. Primary outcome was feasibility (i.e., retention and aromatherapy compliance through Cycle 2). Preliminary efficacy was evaluated using mean composite symptom severity scores (CSSS; sum daily scores of all individual symptoms for the seven days per cycle).
resultsOf the 91 participants randomized, 84 participants started Baseline with 68 completing through Cycle 2. Aromatherapy demonstrated feasibility with overall retention rate of 81.0% (68/84) and high acceptability with 83.3% of all participants reporting use of their inhaler ≥ 21 times during Cycle 2, exceeding our targeted ≥ 75% threshold. The overall change in mean CSSS between Cycle 2 and baseline was on average -1.38 (SE = 0.54), showing reduced symptom severity with aromatherapy.
conclusionAromatherapy is a feasible and acceptable non-pharmacologic integrative modality for chemotherapy symptom management. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms of aromatherapy's effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42624952What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.