ArticleScientific reports2026
A multimodal EMG-IMU dataset and multi-dataset benchmark for deep learning-based human activity recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable sensors is relevant to rehabilitation, assistive robotics, and mobile health applications. This study presents (i) SDALLE, a publicly available multimodal dataset integrating surface electromyography (EMG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals acquired using a DELSYS Trigno wireless system; (ii) a harmonized, subject-dependent comparison with the public ENABL3S dataset; and (iii) an exploratory Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) augmentation strategy for class balancing. SDALLE contains recordings of nine healthy male subjects walking, jogging, climbing stairs and descending stairs. EMG and IMU signals were synchronized, standardized, and segmented using 75%-overlapping windows. In the implemented pipeline, feature standardization preceded segmentation, after which the windows were randomly divided into 70% training and 30% testing subsets without participant- or trial-level grouping. Consequently, overlapping windows, including windows from the same participant and trial, could occur in both subsets. Under this window-level protocol, attention-enhanced CNN-LSTM models recorded approximately 98-99% accuracy on ENABL3S and approximately 99% on SDALLE. These values are protocol-specific and may be optimistic; they do not measure generalization to unseen participants or establish a portable model ranking. GAN augmentation increased the SDALLE row count by approximately 12% and changed average testing accuracy from 96.9% before augmentation to 96.5% afterward under the implemented protocol. The study therefore provides a dataset resource and an exploratory subject-dependent comparison of predictive and computational behavior. Participant-independent evaluation with training-fold-only normalization, model selection, and GAN training is required before drawing conclusions about cross-subject robustness or deployment readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.