Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42624935›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A multimodal EMG-IMU dataset and multi-dataset benchmark for deep learning-based human activity recognition.

Mohamed Khaled Farouk, Mohamed Fawzy El-Khatib, Mohammed I Awad, Mostafa R A Atia, A Abdellatif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed Khaled FaroukMechatronics and Robotics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Egyptian Russian University, Cairo, 11829, Egypt.
Mohamed Fawzy El-KhatibMechatronics and Robotics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Egyptian Russian University, Cairo, 11829, Egypt. muhamed-fawzy@eru.edu.eg.
Mohammed I AwadMechatronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11517, Egypt.
Mostafa R A AtiaMechanical Engineering Department, Arab Academy for Science Technology and Maritime Transport, Sheraton Branch, Cairo, 11757, Egypt.
A AbdellatifMechanical Engineering Department, Arab Academy for Science Technology and Maritime Transport, Sheraton Branch, Cairo, 11757, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable sensors is relevant to rehabilitation, assistive robotics, and mobile health applications. This study presents (i) SDALLE, a publicly available multimodal dataset integrating surface electromyography (EMG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals acquired using a DELSYS Trigno wireless system; (ii) a harmonized, subject-dependent comparison with the public ENABL3S dataset; and (iii) an exploratory Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) augmentation strategy for class balancing. SDALLE contains recordings of nine healthy male subjects walking, jogging, climbing stairs and descending stairs. EMG and IMU signals were synchronized, standardized, and segmented using 75%-overlapping windows. In the implemented pipeline, feature standardization preceded segmentation, after which the windows were randomly divided into 70% training and 30% testing subsets without participant- or trial-level grouping. Consequently, overlapping windows, including windows from the same participant and trial, could occur in both subsets. Under this window-level protocol, attention-enhanced CNN-LSTM models recorded approximately 98-99% accuracy on ENABL3S and approximately 99% on SDALLE. These values are protocol-specific and may be optimistic; they do not measure generalization to unseen participants or establish a portable model ranking. GAN augmentation increased the SDALLE row count by approximately 12% and changed average testing accuracy from 96.9% before augmentation to 96.5% afterward under the implemented protocol. The study therefore provides a dataset resource and an exploratory subject-dependent comparison of predictive and computational behavior. Participant-independent evaluation with training-fold-only normalization, model selection, and GAN training is required before drawing conclusions about cross-subject robustness or deployment readiness.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectromyographyHuman ActivitiesAdultAlgorithmsGenerative Adversarial NetworksHumansMaleWearable Electronic DevicesDeep learningElectromyography and inertial measurement fusionGenerative adversarial networkHuman activity recognitionHybrid convolutional neural network–long short-term memory modelsWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID42624935
PMCPMC13493917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.