ArticleScientific reports2026
APEW-Fed: adaptive privacy-aware ensemble weighting for federated anomaly detection in enterprise resource planning systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are high-value targets for fraud owing to the sensitive financial and operational data they process. Anomaly detection in such systems faces a fundamental tension: centralising data for accurate detection conflicts with privacy regulations such as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the United States' Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). We present APEW-Fed, a federated ensemble framework that resolves this tension through three provably complementary mechanisms. First, Adaptive Privacy-Aware Ensemble Weighting (APEW) frames model fusion as a privacy-penalised optimisation problem and derives closed-form dynamic weights that up-weight privacy-efficient, high-confidence detectors. Second, Feature-Sensitivity Calibrated Differential Privacy (FS-CDP) partitions features into sensitivity tiers and allocates per-tier Gaussian noise budgets that provably minimise total noise variance subject to a global Rényi DP constraint. Third, Federated Anomaly Score Calibration (FASC) reconciles heterogeneous score distributions across clients via differentially private quantile sketches under secure aggregation. Integrating Isolation Forest, a federated autoencoder trained with per-step DP-SGD, adaptive DBSCAN, and gradient boosting, we evaluate on 243,531 real-world ERP transactions with 5000 expert-annotated anomalies and validate on two public benchmarks: the IEEE-CIS Fraud Detection dataset and the NSL-KDD network intrusion dataset. APEW-Fed achieves 93.5% F1-score at [Formula: see text] RDP-only 2.7 percentage points below the non-private centralised baseline-while reducing communication cost by 94% versus FedAvg. On a strictly unbiased uniform-only evaluation subset (2500 transactions, no score-based enrichment), APEW-Fed achieves 92.1% F1, confirming that the headline result is not an artefact of the annotation sampling design. Membership inference attack success is 51.2%, near-random guessing, confirming strong empirical privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.