Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42624874›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Automated seismic fault mapping using convolutional neural networks for the Berenice Field, Western Desert, Egypt.

Mohammed Amer, Walid M Mabrouk, Amr M Eid, Ahmed Metwally

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed AmerGeophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt. mohamedamer@cu.edu.eg.
Walid M MabroukGeophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt.
Amr M EidGeophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt.
Ahmed MetwallyGeophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate fault interpretation remains a cornerstone of hydrocarbon exploration, directly influencing structural modeling, reservoir compartmentalization, and well placement decisions. However, conventional manual fault picking is time-intensive and prone to interpreter bias, especially in structurally complex and noisy seismic datasets such as those from Egypt's Western Desert. This study demonstrates the implementation and performance of Schlumberger's user-trained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based Fault Prediction Module within the Petrel E&P platform for automated fault detection in the Berenice Field, Faghur basin. The applied workflow integrates machine learning-based denoising, sparse interpreter-guided fault labeling, 3D probability cube generation, and fault extraction using thresholded planarity and azimuth attributes. Only three manually labeled seismic lines (< 1% of total volume) were sufficient for model training. The CNN model achieved a Dice coefficient exceeding 0.85 and successfully delineated 65% of the manually mapped faults, while also detecting additional previously unmapped subtle discontinuities. The ML-assisted workflow reduced interpretation time by over 80% compared to traditional methods, maintaining high geological coherence and consistency. These results confirm that machine learning-driven fault detection effectively enhances interpretational accuracy and efficiency in tectonically complex domains. The successful application to the Berenice Field underscores the potential of CNN-based fault prediction as a transformative tool for structural interpretation across Egypt's Western Desert and similar intracratonic settings worldwide.

Indexed as

Berenice FieldCNNMachine learning (ML)Seismic interpretationUser-trained fault prediction

Identifiers

PMID42624874
PMCPMC13493989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.