ArticleScientific reports2026
MARLOWE: taxonomic characterization of unknown samples for forensics using de novo peptide identification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Identification to Insight: Making Full Use of the Diagnostic Potential of MS/MS Proteotyping in Clinical Microbiology Using Efficient Bioinformatics.Journal of proteome research · 2025Review
- Pairwise Attention: Leveraging Mass Differences to Enhance De Novo Sequencing of Mass Spectra.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a computational tool, MARLOWE, for source organism characterization of unknown, forensic biological samples. The intent of MARLOWE is to address a gap in applying proteomics data analysis to forensic applications. MARLOWE produces a list of potential source organisms given confident peptide tags derived from de novo peptide sequencing and a statistical approach to assign peptides to organisms in a probabilistic manner, based on a broad sequence database. Except for the constraints of this underlying broad sequence database, the algorithm assumes no a priori knowledge of potential sources, and the probabilistic way peptides are taxonomically assigned and then scored enables results to be unbiased (within the constraints of the sequence database). In a proof-of-concept study, we examined MARLOWE's performance on two datasets, the Biodiversity dataset and the Bacillus cereus superspecies dataset. Not only did MARLOWE demonstrate successful characterization to true contributors in single source and binary mixtures in the Biodiversity dataset, but also provided sufficient specificity to distinguish species within a bacterial superspecies group. We also compared MARLOWE's results to those of MiCId, a leading microbial identification/characterization tool based on proteomics database search. Comparison of the two tools using 225 mass spectrometry data files yielded comparable performance, with slightly higher accuracy and specificity for MiCId. At the species level, MARLOWE achieved a specificity of 91.4% at 5% FDR. These results suggest that MARLOWE is suitable for candidate- or lead-generation identification of single-organism and binary samples that can generate forensic leads and aid in selecting appropriate follow-on analyses in a forensic context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.