SynthesisVox sanguinis2026
Lessons learned from crises in blood donation services: A systematic review of operational practices.
Synthesis in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lessons learned from crises in blood donation services: A systematic review of operational practices.Vox sanguinis · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesBlood donation services are vital to healthcare delivery, ensuring the continuous availability of safe and adequate blood products, particularly during periods of disruption and crisis. Disruptive events such as pandemics, mass-casualty incidents, (natural) disasters, pandemics, armed conflicts and blood shortages can affect donor availability, logistics, workforce capacity, communication and operational continuity. This study systematically identifies and synthesizes lessons learned from crises affecting blood donation and translates them into a structured framework of operational practices. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature review between 2010 and 2025 was conducted using four databases. Study selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 142 included publications were analysed using qualitative content analysis with MAXQDA and organized using an analytical framework adapted from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) COVID-19 Operational Recommendations Framework.
resultsThe analysis identified six overarching dimensions of operational practice in blood donation services: collaboration, coordination and standards; blood supply chain design and management; resource management; disaster preparedness and risk management; communication; and operations. Three overarching operational practice themes emerged: coordinated governance and communication, operational continuity and organizational resilience.
conclusionCrises affecting blood donation services generate transferable lessons for maintaining safe and reliable blood supply operations under disruptive conditions. This review provides a structured synthesis of cross-crisis operational practices and offers an evidence-based foundation for blood services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42624820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.