ReviewBMJ paediatrics open2026
Review of paediatric pharmacological and non-pharmacological procedural comfort strategies.
Review in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Procedural anxiety and untreated procedural pain can result in adverse clinical and behavioural outcomes. Procedural comfort is defined as the intentional, multidisciplinary management of pain, anxiety and distress before, during and after medical procedures. Strategies to provide procedural comfort can be subdivided into pharmacological and non-pharmacological.Careful planning and preparation, involving both parent and child, and tailoring the procedural comfort strategies to the individual maximise the likelihood of a successful procedure while also minimising pain and distress. This includes determining the location for the procedure (bedside versus treatment room) and consideration of clustering procedures where appropriate. A calm environment should be maintained throughout, and the use of age-appropriate and positive language is key.Non-pharmacological strategies such as positions for comfort, interactive (play therapy, distraction), relaxation (guided imagery, deep breathing, massage, hypnotic communication) and sensory (vibration and cold stimulation, aromatherapy, virtual reality) should be considered for all children and may be combined with sedation if deemed necessary.The choice to sedate must always balance risks (over-sedation/paradoxical reactions) versus the benefits (increased likelihood of a successful attempt, a calmer patient and reduced patient and family distress). If a sedative is needed, the choice is made after a discussion between the medical team and the patient (if appropriate) and their family or carers.Pharmacological strategies include local anaesthetic cream and sedatives, most commonly: benzodiazepines (midazolam and temazepam), α2-adrenoceptor agonists (dexmedetomidine and clonidine) and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists (ketamine). Factors influencing choice of drug include the formulation, route of administration, existing comorbidities, contraindications and previous experience of the patient.Local policy with regard to fasting should be adhered to and children who have been given sedatives should remain supervised by appropriately trained medical staff with accredited paediatric life support skills and be continuously monitored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.