ArticleBMJ open2026
Measurement-Based Care (MBC) in the child and adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) programme in Calgary: study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMeasurement-based care (MBC), defined as the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to monitor symptoms and inform collaborative treatment decisions, has demonstrated benefits in youth mental healthcare. However, evidence on how to implement MBC within specialised child and adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) services remains limited. Existing MBC implementation studies in paediatric mental health services have largely focused on community, school-based or general outpatient settings, leaving an important knowledge gap in specialised multidisciplinary tertiary care. This protocol aims to assess organisational readiness, guide implementation planning and evaluate early implementation outcomes of MBC within a specialised paediatric OCD programme in Calgary, Alberta. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol describes a single-site, three-phase mixed-methods implementation study that includes organisational readiness assessment, theory-informed implementation planning and evaluation of early implementation outcomes of MBC within a specialised child and adolescent OCD programme. Phase 1 employs an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach to assess organisational readiness and contextual determinants using the Readiness Thinking Tool, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Phase 2 focuses on developing and operationalising the implementation plan, guided by the Quality Implementation Framework, through stakeholder co-design, workflow integration, staff training and iterative refinement. The MBC model integrates five PROMs: two general mental health measures and three OCD-specific domains. Phase 3 employs a convergent mixed-methods formative evaluation to assess implementation outcomes, using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, while CFIR guides the assessment of contextual and organisational determinants. Data sources include clinician, youth and caregiver surveys and interviews, PROM completion and score data and implementation field notes. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, while qualitative data will be analysed using a CFIR-guided directed content analysis approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board. This study will generate implementation knowledge to inform the integration and sustainment of MBC within specialised paediatric mental health services. By linking readiness assessment, structured implementation planning and formative evaluation, it will produce a context-specific, practice-oriented implementation blueprint for MBC in paediatric OCD clinic. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder workshops, clinic feedback sessions and policy-focused knowledge exchange activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.