ArticleBMJ open2026
Implementing best-practice burn first-aid in emergency care: a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol in emergency department and prehospital settings.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDissemination of evidence-based burn first-aid is critical for improving clinical outcomes for patients with acute burn injuries. The overarching goal of this research is the successful and sustainable translation of 20 min of cool running water (20CRW), administered within 3 hours of a burn, as a first-aid treatment for acute thermal injuries within emergency departments (EDs) and emergency medical services (EMSs). Despite the well-established benefits of 20CRW, this treatment is not included in relevant USA burn first-aid guidelines and has not been adopted in clinical settings as a standard first-aid treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines an investigation using an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type III design to evaluate the effectiveness of 20CRW implementation into ED and EMS settings in Sacramento, California. The principal aim of this research is to implement 20CRW as a first-aid treatment for acute thermal burn injuries within participating ED and EMS settings. We will assess adherence to 20CRW guidelines and provision following implementation into routine clinical practice. In addition, we will evaluate the clinical effectiveness of 20CRW in improving patient outcomes, and the acceptability of 20CRW as a burn first-aid treatment, considering both clinician and burn survivor perspectives. This research will generate critical evidence on the implementation and clinical impact of 20CRW in US emergency care settings. It will also evaluate whether the co-designed implementation strategies effectively support adoption of 20CRW within the US ED and EMS settings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval has been awarded for this research (IRB ID: 18834-5) from the University of California Davis Office of Research Ethics Committee. Results of this investigation will be disseminated across participating hospital and EMS organisations, presented at national and international conferences and published in open access peer-reviewed journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.