Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42624579›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Obstetric Bleeding Study UK (OBS UK): protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a maternity quality improvement programme to reduce excess bleeding and need for transfusion after childbirth.

Sarah Joanne Kotecha, Claire Potter, Josh Hope-Bell, Nathan S Riddell, Kim Munnery, Olu Onyimadu, Catherine Liberty, Hazel Taylor, Caitlin Dop, Lucy De Lloyd and 24 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Sarah Joanne KotechaCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.
Claire PotterCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0831-3514
Josh Hope-BellCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1347-2800
Nathan S RiddellDepartment of Perioperative Care, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Kim MunneryCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9299-916X
Olu OnyimaduNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1724-3485
Catherine LibertyDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Hazel TaylorCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.
Caitlin DopCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.
Lucy De LloydDepartment of Perioperative Care, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
William Parry-SmithShrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.
Julia TownsonCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.
Philip PallmannCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8274-9696
Gwenllian MoodyCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.
Yvonne MoriartyCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-4699
Rachel DeereCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.
Christian BarlowCardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, UK.
Amrit DhaddaDepartment of Perioperative Care, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Amy ElsmoreShrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.
Seren WillsonLeicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Helen MillwardShrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.
Kate SiddallShrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.
Julia SandersCardiff University School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff, UK.
Simon J StanworthDepartment of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7414-4950
Mairead BlackUniversity of Aberdeen Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6841-8601
Stavros PetrouNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tanvi RaiNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pauline SladeDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Lisa HintonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Haddy FyeCambridge Centre for Frontotemporal Dementia and Related Disorders, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ayse Gur GedenInstitute of Education, UCL, London, UK.
Rachel E CollisDepartment of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Peter CollinsCardiff University Cardiff Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff, UK collinspw@cardiff.ac.uk.
Sarah BellDepartment of Anaesthetics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBleeding during and after childbirth (postpartum haemorrhage, PPH) is the leading cause of severe maternal morbidity in the UK. Between 2017 and 2018, a PPH care bundle termed the Obstetric Bleeding Strategy (OBS) was implemented as a quality improvement project across all Welsh maternity units and improvements in maternal outcomes were observed. The OBS PPH care bundle incorporates assessment of bleeding risk, real-time cumulative quantification of blood loss, escalation of multiprofessional care including more senior staff at defined volumes of blood loss and point-of-care testing of coagulation at 1 L blood loss (or earlier if clinical concern) with targeted blood product transfusion in cases of haemostatic impairment. The Obstetric Bleeding Study UK (OBS UK) will evaluate this intervention in a larger number of maternity units across the UK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: OBS UK is a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial designed to test the effectiveness of the OBS intervention compared with usual care on clinical and psychological PPH outcomes after childbirth, evaluate its cost-effectiveness and perform a process evaluation. The study will be capturing data from over 270 000 women and birthing people giving birth in the care of 36 participating maternity units during the 30-month study period. All maternity units will undertake a control period (lasting 3-18 months) during which usual PPH care will be provided, followed by a 9-month implementation period during which the OBS PPH care bundle will be introduced using quality improvement methods and then an OBS UK intervention period (lasting 3-18 months) during which OBS PPH care will be delivered.The primary outcome is the number of women receiving allogeneic red blood cell transfusion for PPH per 1000 maternities. Secondary outcomes are informed by the core PPH outcome set, psychological and cost-effectiveness measures for women and their partners and a mixed methods process evaluation exploring how the intervention was deployed and possible improvements to inform wider implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: OBS UK will establish whether (and how) the OBS UK PPH care bundle improves outcomes and experiences of women and their partners. Published results will provide evidence to inform PPH maternity care across the UK and internationally. Dissemination of the findings will be made available to members of the public and participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17679951.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionPatient Care BundlesPostpartum HemorrhageQuality ImprovementCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignUnited KingdomBlood bank & transfusion medicineClinical ProtocolsElectronic Health RecordsMaternal medicineQuality ImprovementRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID42624579
PMCPMC13504888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.