Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42624578›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Can nursing students boost exercise therapy in a subacute ward? An implementation study.

Seema Radhakrishnan, Christina Eagleton, Minh Pham, Sarah Faulds, Carmen Lazar, Friedbert Kohler, Rebecca Ivers, Marie K March

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seema RadhakrishnanUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia s.radhakrishnan@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2850-6666
Christina EagletonDepartment of Physiotherapy, Fairfield Hospital, Fairfield, New South Wales, Australia.
Minh PhamDepartment of Physiotherapy, Fairfield Hospital, Fairfield, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah FauldsDepartment of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, Fairfield Hospital, Fairfield, New South Wales, Australia.
Carmen LazarAssyrian Australian Association, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Friedbert KohlerUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rebecca IversUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Marie K MarchUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the feasibility, uptake, safety, effectiveness and acceptability of nursing students and allied health assistants (AHAs) delivering additional exercise sessions during inpatient geriatric rehabilitation and to assess whether this model improved patient and health service outcomes compared with usual care.

designProspective pre-post implementation evaluation.

settingA single secondary-care geriatric subacute rehabilitation ward in metropolitan Australia.

participantsAll patients aged ≥65 years admitted with deconditioning, falls or hip fracture who were able to weight-bear were eligible. Exclusion criteria included inability to participate in exercise or medical instability. Sixty-four participants were included in the pre-implementation cohort and 115 in the implementation cohort (91% uptake).

interventionsNursing students were supported to deliver up to two additional weekday exercise sessions alongside usual physiotherapy care and AHAs delivered one additional weekend exercise session. Implementation strategies were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and included staff orientation, training, supervision and structured verbal and written handovers. The intervention was delivered over a 6-month period. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were feasibility and uptake. Secondary outcomes included safety (falls and medical emergency calls), effectiveness (functional independence, mobility, discharge destination and subacute length of stay) and acceptability.

resultsNursing students delivered 13 exercise sessions in total, indicating low feasibility, whereas AHA-led sessions were delivered consistently, with participants receiving one additional session during a mean 15-day admission. No statistically significant differences were observed in functional independence, mobility, discharge destination or length of stay (LOS) (implementation: mean 15.5 days, SD 11.2; pre-implementation: mean 16.4 days, SD 12.4). Falls incidence decreased from 52 events pre-implementation to 38 during implementation, although this did not reach statistical significance. The study was not powered to detect small differences, and CIs were not calculated.

conclusionsUsing nursing students to deliver additional therapy sessions was not feasible, whereas AHA-led sessions were easier to implement. The intervention was safe. The fidelity of the nursing student-led component was compromised by multiple personal, service and system-level factors.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyStudents, NursingAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesGERIATRIC MEDICINEImplementation ScienceNursing researchREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID42624578
PMCPMC13504874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.