Observational studyBMJ open2026
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in Iranian elderly population: a nationwide claims-based analysis.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePotentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in the elderly is associated with adverse outcomes and increased healthcare use. We aimed to estimate its prevalence and pattern among the elderly population of Iran using the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria.
designRetrospective, population-based observational study.
settingNationwide data of Iran Health Insurance Organization (IHIO) prescription claims from 24 provinces (21 March 2014 to 19 March 2017).
participantsAdults aged ≥60 years with at least one prescription in the dataset were included. The study comprised 2 696 300 older adults who received 28 575 400 prescriptions.
interventionsNot applicable. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Using a two-stage curation process, we selected STOPP version 3 criteria that could be operationalised from dispensing data alone (age, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code, dose, duration and concurrent use). For each criterion, we calculated prescription and patient level PIP prevalence overall and among at-risk prescriptions.
resultsAcross the curated STOPP criteria, 313 315 prescriptions issued to 131 012 patients met at least one PIP criterion. The most frequent PIPs were concurrent beta blocker and diltiazem use (99 027 prescriptions; 1.26% of patients), benzodiazepine therapy ≥4 weeks (89 240 prescriptions; 1.60% of patients), ≥2 anticholinergic drugs (47 079 prescriptions; 0.78% of patients) and concomitant non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug plus anticoagulant (25 685 prescriptions; 0.38% of patients). PIPs involving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, ticlopidine, clonidine and methyldopa were rare.
conclusionsIn this nationwide claims-based study, about 5% of elderly Iranians were exposed to PIPs, particularly chronic benzodiazepine use, excessive anticholinergic burden and high-risk cardiovascular and antithrombotic combinations. Our findings provide concrete targets for claims-based surveillance and interventions to improve prescribing safety in Iran's ageing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.