ReviewCell2026
Neurodegeneration as a dysregulation of neuroimmune crosstalk.
Review in Cell, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurodegeneration is increasingly recognized not only as a disorder of neurons but also as a breakdown of dialogue between the nervous and immune systems. Recent discoveries reveal that immune cells and inflammatory signals are deeply interwoven with brain function across the lifespan. Far from passive responders, immune cells act as sentinels and shapers of neuronal resilience, vulnerability, and repair. Together, robust data support a model in which neurodegeneration emerges from complex interactions between neural and immune networks, positioning the immune system as both a sensor and driver of brain health. This perspective synthesizes a growing body of work arguing that neurodegenerative diseases are a failure of neuroimmune crosstalk-where protective signals are lost, and maladaptive responses take hold. By restoring immune homeostasis, fine-tuning inflammatory responses, or targeting epigenetic regulators of the immune state, it may be possible not only to slow degeneration but also to promote recovery. We outline the key challenges and opportunities for this paradigm shift and highlight how a deeper integration of neuroscience and immunology could transform the future of treating neurodegenerative diseases. Lastly, we describe critical focus areas to improve our understanding of neurodegeneration and highlight the development of immune-based therapeutics for neurodegeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.