ArticlePediatric neurology2026
Patient and Family Perspectives on Point-of-Care Low-Field Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Children in the Emergency Department, Intensive Care Unit, and Hospital Setting.
Article in Pediatric neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Portable Ultra-Low-Field MRI in Outpatient Neurology: An Examination of Clinical Performance and Patient Experience.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care, low-field brain magnetic resonance imaging (POC LF-MRI) systems allow for bedside neuroimaging at low magnetic field strengths. POC LF-MRI can potentially avoid drawbacks of other scanning modalities, such as radiation exposure and patient transport away from caregivers. This study aims to describe patient and family perspectives toward POC LF-MRI and compare their experiences to standard clinical neuroimaging (computed tomography [CT] or MRI) in pediatric acute care settings.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, single-center cohort study enrolling children <18 years undergoing standard-of-care clinical neuroimaging in the emergency department, inpatient units, or intensive care unit. A research POC LF-MRI was performed within 72 hours of clinical neuroimaging. Participants/families completed a survey assessing satisfaction, comfort, and imaging modality preferences. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed.
resultsOf 137 participants (median age 12 years [interquartile range 8-14 years]), 94 (68.6%) underwent clinical neuroimaging with CT and 43 (31.4%) underwent conventional MRI. Participants rated their POC LF-MRI experience more favorably than conventional neuroimaging (P = 0.003) and reported greater comfort (P = 0.004). Most patients/families preferred POC LF-MRI (n = 86, 63.2%), while 16.9% (n = 23) preferred conventional neuroimaging, and 19.9% (n = 27) reported an equal preference. Among those undergoing CT, the majority (n = 54/55, 98.2%) rated radiation avoidance as important to their preferences. Patients/families found POC LF-MRI less intimidating than conventional neuroimaging (P = 0.002).
conclusionsPOC LF-MRI was perceived as more comfortable and preferable to conventional neuroimaging. These findings can complement the clinical implementation of bedside POC LF-MRI in pediatric acute care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.