ArticlePoultry science2026
Isolation and identification of host-associated lactic acid bacteria with probiotic potential from Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and preliminary in vivo evaluation in broiler chickens.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gastrointestinal tract of host-associated birds may provide avian-adapted probiotic candidates for poultry production. This study isolated and characterized lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from Red Junglefowl (RJF; Gallus gallus), screened representative strains for probiotic-related in vitro traits, and performed a preliminary in vivo evaluation in broiler chickens. Thirty-nine presumptive LAB were recovered from the crop, small intestine, large intestine, and cecum of RJF birds and were assigned by near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing to Limosilactobacillus reuteri (28/39, 71.8%), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (8/39, 20.5%), and Weissella paramesenteroides (3/39, 7.7%), represented 14 sequence types. Representative strains were assessed for auto-aggregation, surface hydrophobicity, antagonistic activity against Escherichia coli and Salmonella sp., acid and bile tolerance, hemolysis, DNase activity, and phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility. Marked strain-to-strain variation was observed, but L. reuteri-1, L. salivarius-3, and W. paramesenteroides-3 showed the most balanced overall profiles and were selected for a multi-strain formulation. In a 35-d broiler trial, 108 Arbor Acres chicks were divided into three groups: a PBS control group, an RJF-derived candidate probiotic mixture (RJF-Mix) group, and a commercial probiotic product (CPP) group, with 6 pens per treatment and 6 birds per pen. All chicks had almost similar initial body weights, and there was no significant difference among treatments in total feed intake. However, final body weight was 2485.5 ± 37.3 g/bird in the RJF-Mix group and 2513.7 ± 23.4 g/bird in the CPP group, compared with 2288.6 ± 27.8 g/bird in the control group (P < 0.0001). The RJF-Mix (1.377 ± 0.006) and CPP group (1.364 ± 0.010) showed lower final cumulative feed conversion ratio as compared to the control group (1.517 ± 0.014; P < 0.0001). To our knowledge, this is the first study to recover host-associated LAB from the wild ancestor of the domestic chicken, RJF, and to advance selected isolates from a transparent, criterion-based in vitro prioritization to preliminary in vivo broiler validation against a CFU-matched commercial probiotic comparator. In conclusion, these findings indicate that RJF might be a promising natural resource of host-associated LAB with potential for poultry probiotic development; however, the three selected isolates are presented as promising probiotic candidates rather than fully validated probiotics, and further genomic, safety, and larger-scale validation are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.