ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
The How and Why of Exercise Prescription. Patients' Experience of Prescribed Exercise in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleMusculoskeletal physiotherapy, including the exercise prescription element, should be patient-centred with an active patient involved in the decision making. Currently, exercise prescription relies heavily on published literature and clinical expertise, however there is limited published research on the patient's experience with the exercise prescription process in a one-on-one outpatient setting. AIMS AND
objectivesThis study aimed to explore patients' experiences of the exercise prescription process in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and to develop a grounded understanding of the elements that are important considerations to patients in a one-on-one rehabilitation setting.
methodsTwenty participants who had recently completed outpatient physiotherapy for a musculoskeletal condition took part in a semi-structured interview. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently, with recruitment continuing until theoretical saturation was reached. Data were analysed using published grounded theory methods.
resultsTwo main categories emerged describing the patient experience of exercise prescription, WHY and HOW, with individualisation of the program to the patient acting as the core concept. WHY encompassed education, feedback and collaboration, which built patients' understanding, trust and confidence in their exercise program and supported a therapeutic alliance. HOW encompassed exercise selection, prescription method, dosage parameters, progressive overload and prescription tools, reflecting how the program was practically developed and delivered. These elements were interdependent, with the WHY elements informing the HOW elements, all converging on individualisation as the core concept for an effective exercise prescription process.
conclusionPatients value an individualised, collaborative approach to exercise prescription that integrates education, ongoing feedback and prescription methods tailored to their goals and context. These findings offer physiotherapists patient-informed insight to complement existing clinician focused literature to guide the exercise prescription process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.