ArticlePloS one2026
Interpretable machine learning for hikikomori screening: The adaptive HRI-15.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hikikomori, or prolonged social withdrawal, is an issue of global relevance. The HRI-15 is a brief tool for its assessment. This study enhances its utility by adding clinical thresholds to identify risk and person-centered clinical profiles, and by developing a machine-learning(ML)-based computerized adaptive test (CAT) to enable rapid screening. Data from a national survey of Italian adolescents (N = 8,755) were used to conduct ROC analysis and latent profile analysis (LPA). The findings indicated that a score of ≥ 42 achieved optimal classification performance, and four profiles with distinct meanings and systematic differences in anxiety, depression, impulsivity, and risk behaviors were identified. A multivariate conditional inference tree was estimated to develop an ML-based adaptive version of the instrument. The CAT reduced administered items by 53% (7.03/15), accurately reproducing full-length scores (r = .77-.997) and the corresponding classification; alignment was assessed with latent transition analysis (entropy = .96). The procedure was integrated into an application supporting administration, scoring, and reporting (score, risk, profiles, graphs). Combining a cross-validated cutoff and clinically useful profiles with CAT and its automated administration and reporting application strengthens triage and personalization, enabling large-scale, multidomain screening and earlier intervention for hikikomori risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.