ArticlePloS one2026
Quantifying the evolution of harmony and novelty in western classical music.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Music is a complex socio-cultural construct that fascinates researchers across many fields. Understanding its historical development may inform questions of perception and cognition, and offer insight into cultural transmission, creativity, and innovation. Here we study musical features related to harmony and document how they evolved over 400 years in western classical music. We develop a variant of the center of effect algorithm to assign the most likely key to a given set of notes, representing a piece as a sequence of local keys computed bar by bar, and we define information-theoretic measures of key uncertainty, key diversity, and novelty in key transitions. We illustrate these measures with specific examples and give them a musical interpretation, showing how they can be used to study the evolution of harmony. Applying them across the corpus, we confirm several trends previously reported by musicologists and scientists, with some discrepancies during the Classical period: in particular, we find a decline in harmonic innovation during the Early Classical period followed by a steep increase in the Late Classical, for which we offer an explanation consistent with accounts by music theorists. Comparing composers directly by their key-transition vocabularies, we further find that they group by historical period, and that both the overall arrangement and the individual nearest-neighbor relations recover connections consistent with the documented historical record. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this approach for cross-cultural studies and the need for more expressive yet tractable score representations, and a large and reliable corpus, for future study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.