ArticlePloS one2026
Use of machine learning to detect Escherichia coli in drinking water in Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a key indicator of fecal contamination in freshwater and can signal the presence of other harmful bacteria and viruses. The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) tools to detect E. coli in drinking water in Bangladesh using surveillance data under two scenarios: an imbalanced dataset and a balanced dataset. We utilized data from the 2019 Bangladesh Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey, which included a total of 6,069 household drinking water samples. We used agglomerative hierarchical clustering with Ward's linkage to identify district-level hotspots. Extreme Gradient Boosting with SHapley Additive exPlanations values were used for feature selection, and the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was used to address class imbalance in the classification task. We applied nine classical ML models in this study: Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Decision Trees (DT), Gradient Boosting Algorithm (GBA), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Logistic Regression (LR), Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), along with a Deep Learning Multi-Layer Perceptron (DL-MLP) model to predict the risk of E. coli contamination (REcC) in water. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, Cohen Kappa, area under the curve (AUC), and a violin plot. E. coli contamination in drinking water was detected in 39.2% (95% CI: 37.4-41.2) of households. Bandarban district had the highest REcC. After applying SMOTE and 10-fold cross-validation with hyperparameter tuning, model performance was more consistent across algorithms. In terms of model evaluation, AdaBoost slightly outperformed the others with an accuracy of 81.6%, Cohen kappa statistic of 19.4%, precision of 82.2%, recall of 99%, F1-score of 89.8%, and an AUC of 68.6%. Ensemble model for example AdaBoost and GBA models had ability to accurately classify drinking water samples with respect to the presence of E. coli using surveillance data than others selected model in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.