ArticlePloS one2026
Quality control protocol of the National Mental Health Survey-2 of India.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Mental Health Survey of India - 2 (NMHS-2), currently underway (2024-26), is one of the largest psychiatric epidemiological studies globally, interviewing more than 250,000 individuals across all 36 states and union territories. Given India's scale and diversity, a rigorous quality control (QC) protocol has been developed to ensure methodological fidelity, data reliability, and operational consistency. Designed through iterative consultations with national and international experts, and approved by the National Technical Advisory Group, the protocol leverages lessons from NMHS-1 and integrates global best practices to meet India's unique challenges. This protocol aims to describe the QC framework of NMHS-2, highlighting its design, core components, and implementation strategies. Key components include a multi-tiered administrative structure, systematic instrument selection, its validation and translation; structured training programs for field data collectors; and pre-survey pilot testing of the sampling design. The critical Core QC strategy involves a custom-made digital data collection platform with built-in logic checks, real-time dashboards, multi-source data verification, and re-interviews, apart from standardized data cleaning protocols. Comprehensive documentation and regular review meetings at both state and central levels further strengthen accountability and transparency. By integrating international standards with locally tailored approaches, NMHS-2 establishes a replicable model for quality assurance in large-scale mental health surveys. This paper addresses a critical gap in the literature on structured QC protocols for psychiatric epidemiological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.