Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42623346›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A generalizability analysis framework for bias resilience in convolution neural network and transformer models for diabetic retinopathy screening.

Majida Kazmi, Bisma Imran, Saad A Qazi, M A Rehman Siddiqui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Majida KazmiFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2767-3139
Bisma ImranNeurocomputation Lab, National Centre of Artificial Intelligence, NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3697-4010
Saad A QaziFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.
M A Rehman SiddiquiDepartment of Surgery, Agha Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5100-3189

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening has seen extensive research progress, yet its clinical adoption remains limited, largely due to insufficient attention to model generalizability across diverse populations and imaging conditions. Existing studies often overlook the role of dataset biases, arising from demographic, acquisition, and preprocessing variations that undermine robustness in real-world settings. To address this critical gap, we propose a comprehensive generalizability analysis framework that systematically categorizes dataset biases, evaluates their impact on performance, and introduces robust inter-dataset comparison metrics. The framework is metric-agnostic and extensible to multi-class severity grading, with stage-wise BAG formulations introduced to support more detailed clinical evaluation. Using one primary (EyePACS) and nine secondary datasets, we assessed the generalizability of two distinct architectures: a convolutional neural network (MobileNetV2) and a transformer-based model (CvT). Performance was evaluated through intra-group measures (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC) and a newly proposed Bias-Adjusted Generalization (BAG) index designed to quantify resilience to bias-induced domain shifts. Results demonstrate that CvT consistently outperformed MobileNetV2, achieving an average accuracy of 87% and a BAG index of 0.94, compared to MobileNetV2's 78% accuracy and BAG index of 0.91. Gradient-based explainability visualizations further confirm that both models attend to clinically relevant retinal regions, with architectural differences in activation patterns consistent with their respective generalizability profiles. These findings highlight the inherent bias resilience of transformer architectures, while highlighting their computational demands as a barrier to deployment in low-resource environments. Importantly, the study suggests that integrating transformer-inspired mechanisms into lightweight CNNs could yield clinically scalable models with both efficiency and robustness. Our framework offers a standardized approach for bias-aware evaluation, providing actionable insights for developing equitable, generalizable, and resource-adaptable AI solutions for DR screening.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyMass ScreeningConvolutional Neural NetworksHumans

Identifiers

PMID42623346
PMCPMC13492755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.