ArticleMedical physics2026
Dose modeling of superficial brachytherapy applicator geometries using multiple radioisotopes.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuperficial brachytherapy enables localized dose delivery for superficial cutaneous lesions, but conventional applicators may be limited in treating extended, irregular, or curved surfaces. Geometric constraints, gaps or overlaps between adjacent applicators, and placement-related uncertainties can reduce dose uniformity, underscoring the need to optimize applicator geometry and deployment strategy. PURPOSE: To enhance the efficacy of superficial brachytherapy for irregular or curved cutaneous surfaces, we conducted a dosimetric analysis of beta and photon sources utilizing modular circular and hexagonal applicator geometries. The study emphasizes dose uniformity, the impact of applicator dimensional variations, and the evaluation of alternative deployment strategies.
methodsMonte Carlo simulations were performed for beta sources (P-32, Sr/Y-90, and Ho-166) and photon sources (I-125, Pd-103, and Yb-169). Applicator models incorporating a zirconia absorber with ceramic and tungsten shielding were constructed, and dose distributions were scored in a water-equivalent medium. Percent depth-dose (PDD) curves were generated for beta sources, and photon sources. Multi-applicator configurations were evaluated on planar and curved surfaces under both simultaneous and sequential delivery. Applicator-size effects were examined using two active radii (5.50 mm and 2.75 mm). Dose uniformity was quantified using the mean dose and the peak-to-valley ratio (PVR) at 1 mm depth.
resultsBeta sources were strongly affected by applicator size and geometry, producing larger variations in near-surface dose uniformity than photon sources. Sequential delivery reduced peak-to-valley modulation for all radioisotopes. Reducing the applicator radius increased the number of deliverable positions on curved surfaces by 60%-83%, increased mean dose by 28%-71%, and decreased PVR by 33%-86%, indicating improved uniformity. Photon sources showed more stable behavior, with lower sensitivity to applicator geometry and size.
conclusionRadioisotope type, applicator radius, and delivery mode significantly influence superficial dose distributions. Smaller applicators and sequential deployment improve dose uniformity, particularly for beta sources. These results provide practical guidance for radioisotope selection and modular applicator design in superficial brachytherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.