Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42623255›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Visuomotor mismatch EEG responses over occipital cortex of freely moving human subjects.

Magdalena Solyga, Marek Zelechowski, Georg B Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magdalena SolygaFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-2963
Marek ZelechowskiCenter for Medical Image Analysis and Navigation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-3173
Georg B KellerFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1401-0117

Funding

European Research Council 10.3030/865617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Likely the strongest predictor of visual feedback is self-motion. In mice, the coupling between movement and visual feedback is learned with first visual experience of the world, and brief perturbations of the coupling result in strong visuomotor mismatch responses in visual cortex that possibly reflect prediction errors. In humans, predictive coding has primarily been studied using oddball paradigms, which rely on violations of stimulus probability based on recent sensory history. It was still unclear, however, whether humans exhibit visuomotor mismatch responses similar to those observed in mice. This question was important for two reasons. First, visuomotor mismatch responses in humans constitute a basis to start translating the mechanistic understanding of the circuit that computes these responses from mouse to human cortex. Second, a paradigm that can trigger strong prediction error responses and consequently requires shorter recording times would simplify experiments in a clinical setting. Here, by combining a wireless EEG recording system with a virtual reality headset, we found robust visuomotor mismatch responses in human cortex that were characterized by a reversed polarity relative to visual-evoked responses and a greater signal power than both visual responses and oddball mismatch responses.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyFeedback, SensoryOccipital LobeVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementPhotic StimulationYoung AdultEEGhumanneurosciencepredictive processingvirtual realityvisuomotor mismatch responses

Identifiers

PMID42623255
PMCPMC13493123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.