Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42623189›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026

The origin of non-specific effects of vaccines and the role of randomised clinical trials.

Christine S Benn, Sebastian Nielsen, Frederik Schaltz-Buchholzer, Peter Aaby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine S BennBandim Health Project, Indepth Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Sebastian NielsenBandim Health Project, Indepth Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Frederik Schaltz-BuchholzerBandim Health Project, Indepth Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Peter AabyBandim Health Project, Indepth Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.ORCID 0000-0001-8331-1389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent articles claim that randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have not documented non-specific effects of vaccines (NSE), i.e. broader immunomodulatory effects of vaccines. We reviewed the role of RCTs in the discovery of NSEs. The articles claiming no NSEs misread the literature, disregarded non-RCT data, and did not take interactions with other interventions into consideration. RCTs have played a limited role in the discovery of the NSEs of vaccines. Instead, contradictions in non-RCT data have helped to document NSEs; most important have been abrupt mortality changes, sex-differential effects, differential effects by sequence of vaccinations, maternal priming effects, beneficial boosting, negative boosting, mortality effects after disease eradication/elimination, and interacting interventions changing the mortality ratio (MR) in RCTs. Vaccine efficacy studies assume that true protective effects are independent of context; in contrast, the immunological mechanisms underlying NSEs are context-dependent as other vaccines, micronutrients and immune history may affect the capacity of the immune system to protect against unrelated infections. Thus, NSEs do exist. The way forward will be to intensify studies of the contextual factors affecting the NSEs to optimize their usefulness for vaccine programmes.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaccine EfficacyVaccinesHumansVaccinationVaccinesEpidemiologyimmune modulatorsmeaslestrials for developing countriesvaccinology

Identifiers

PMID42623189
PMCPMC13502038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.