ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2026
Molecular Mechanisms of Electric Signals Generated at Corneal Wounds.
Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over 150 years ago, it was demonstrated that wounds produce electric fields and currents. Recent research provides strong evidence that these electric fields send a powerful signal to guide the migration of cells and epithelial sheets to heal. However, the mechanisms by which wounds generate and regulate the electric signals are not known. Here, we demonstrate that cornea wound electric currents are an actively regulated wound response. Using a systematic and hierarchical drug screening strategy, starting with general inhibitors for channels/pumps of sodium, chloride, potassium, and calcium channels, we found an essential role for chloride channels. The flux of chloride ions contributes over 80% of the wound electric current, and the increase in chloride flux after cornea injury correlates with the rise of the wound electric signal. Next, utilizing more specific chloride channel blockers, we identified calcium-activated chloride channels (CaCCs) as playing an important role in generating the wound electric currents in rat cornea. Specific CaCC blockers dramatically and reversibly blocked the currents. In addition, using specific drugs which increase or decrease corneal epithelial cell internal calcium in turn enhanced or diminished, respectively, the wound electric current. The electric signals are also (both reversibly) energy-consuming and temperature-dependent. These data identify CaCCs as molecular generators that actively produce cornea wound electric currents, suggesting critical molecular links between calcium signaling, chloride channel activities, and wound electric fields in wound electrical signaling and wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.