SynthesisPituitary2026
Clinical presentation, investigation findings, and outcomes of hypophysitis in sarcoidosis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHypophysitis in sarcoidosis is a rare manifestation of neurosarcoidosis that may cause permanent endocrine dysfunction, visual impairment, and neurological morbidity. We performed a systematic review to characterize its clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, treatment, and outcomes.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to January 22, 2025, for reports of adult patients with sarcoidosis-related hypophysitis. Cases were reassessed according to the 2018 Neurosarcoidosis Consortium Consensus Group criteria. Individual patient data were extracted regarding clinical manifestations, hormonal abnormalities, imaging findings, systemic involvement, treatment, recurrence, and long-term outcomes. Sensitivity analyses restricted the cohort to patients meeting definite or probable criteria and stratified cases by publication era (1954-1999, 2000-2017, 2018-2024) to assess the robustness of findings and the impact of temporal heterogeneity.
resultsA total of 166 studies comprising 274 patients were included. Diagnostic certainty was definite in 26.3%, probable in 47.8%, and possible in 25.9% of cases. Median age was 37 years (IQR 28-48), and 53.5% were male. AVP deficiency was the most frequent manifestation (53.6%), followed by gonadal dysfunction (38.3%), visual loss (36.1%), headache (32.2%), and fatigue (30.5%). Central hypogonadism was the most common anterior pituitary abnormality (74.1%), followed by central hypothyroidism (63.6%) and hyperprolactinemia (58.1%). MRI most commonly demonstrated pituitary stalk thickening (43.1%) and sellar/suprasellar masses (36.4%). CSF analysis frequently showed elevated protein (68.9%) and pleocytosis (59.5%). Systemic involvement occurred in 80.3% of patients, predominantly affecting lymph nodes and lungs. Although corticosteroids were the mainstay of treatment, recurrence occurred in 43.1% of patients, chronic hormone replacement was required in 36.2%, and long-term desmopressin dependence occurred in 30.5%. Findings were materially unchanged when restricted to the definite/probable cohort (n = 203) and across publication eras, despite increased MRI use and greater adoption of steroid-sparing and biologic therapies over time.
conclusionsHypophysitis in sarcoidosis should be suspected in patients presenting with stalk thickening, sellar lesions, AVP deficiency, or unexplained hypogonadism. Because serum and CSF biomarkers showed limited sensitivity, systemic investigation and extracranial biopsy are essential. Despite treatment, recurrence and persistent endocrine dysfunction remain common, highlighting the need for long-term multidisciplinary follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.