ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Early evolution of oral feeding skills in very preterm infants: impact of an oral stimulation protocol assessed by cot-side suckometer: a pilot study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07632066 (Early Evolution of Oral Feeding Skills in Very Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Evolution of Oral Feeding Skills in Very Preterm Infants: Impact of an Oral Stimulation Program Assessed by Cot-side Suckometer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral feeding acquisition is frequently delayed in very preterm infants, potentially affecting hospital discharge timing and longer-term feeding competence. Evidence supporting oral stimulation interventions remains heterogeneous, with few objective longitudinal assessments available. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of cot-side assessment of non-nutritive sucking (suckometry) for assessing sucking maturation and to characterise early sucking performances before and after implementation of a structured oral stimulation protocol. We conducted a prospective quality improvement (QI) pre-post uncontrolled pilot study in a single-centre level III neonatal unit among infants born at 27-32 weeks' gestational age. Sucking performance was measured weekly from the first postnatal week until full oral feeding autonomy using a novel cot-side suckometer. Clinical characteristics and sucking performances were compared before and after protocol implementation. Seventeen infants were included (11 before, 6 after protocol). Median gestational age was 29.7 weeks and birth weight 1320 g (comparable between groups). Cot-side suckometry proved feasible from the first postnatal days. Approximately 73% of non-stimulated infants exhibited an early decline in sucking performance (a ~ 40% reduction, primarily affecting suction and compression bursts), whereas stimulated infants demonstrated progressive improvement (an approximately 120% increase). Conclusion: Cot-side suckometry provides feasible objective assessment of sucking maturation in very preterm infants. Oral stimulation was associated with more favourable sucking development, warranting further evaluation in larger trials. What is Known: • Very preterm infants commonly experience delayed transition to oral feeding due to immature suck-swallow-breathe coordination • Oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking interventions are widely employed, but systematic reviews highlight inconsistent evidence regarding optimal protocols and clinical benefits What is New: • A novel cot-side suckometer enables reliable objective assessment of sucking maturation from the earliest postnatal days in very preterm infants • Implementation of oral stimulation was associated with prevention of early performance decline and progressive sucking enhancement Trial registration: NCT07632066 (06/02/2026).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.