Observational studyMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026
Feasibility and safety of accelerated MVAC (aMVAC) in geriatric patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Observational study in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dose-dense MVAC (ddMVAC) is a standard regimen for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but tolerability concerns often limit its use in geriatric patients. Accelerated MVAC (aMVAC), delivered as a single-day regimen, may reduce hospital visits and resource use. This study assessed the feasibility and safety of aMVAC in geriatric patients with MIBC in a real-world, resource-constrained setting. We included patients aged 60 years or older with histologically confirmed MIBC (stages II-IV). Eligible patients received three or four cycles of single-day aMVAC (methotrexate 30 mg/m², vinblastine 3 mg/m², doxorubicin 30 mg/m², cisplatin 70 mg/m²) every 14 days, with growth factor support. Feasibility was defined as completing 3 or 4 cycles within the protocol-defined duration. Toxicities were graded per CTCAE v5.0. Among 33 geriatric patients, 30 (90.9%) completed ≥ 3 cycles, and 28 (84.8%) completed four cycles within the planned timeframe. Dose reductions for grade 3 or higher toxicities were required in 10 (30.3%) patients, and treatment discontinuation occurred in 3 (9%). Grade 3 hematologic events occurred in 12% and non-hematologic events in 33.3%; the most common were anemia, mucositis, and fatigue. No grade 4 toxicities, febrile neutropenia, or treatment-related deaths were observed. Pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0N0) was achieved in 8 (36.4%) patients, and 12 (54.5%) patients had pathologic down-staging compared with their clinical stage. aMVAC is a feasible regimen for geriatric patients with MIBC, achieving high treatment completion rates and acceptable toxicity. The simplified one-day protocol reduces hospital stay and logistical burden while maintaining therapeutic intensity. aMVAC represents a practical and feasible alternative in real-world, resource-limited settings.Clinical Trial RegistrationThe trial was registered under clinical trial registry of India : CTRI/2021/10/037450.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42622897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.