ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026
Development and Validation of a Measure of Undergraduate Students' English Writing Motivation in Chinese Universities.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior second language writing motivation research tends to view writing motivation as a unidimensional construct or fails to represent the latest theoretical insights in motivational research. This study therefore aimed to validate the English as a Foreign Language Writing Motivation Questionnaire (EFL-WMQ) designed to capture the multidimensionality of EFL writing motivation from multiple theoretical perspectives. A secondary aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between EFL-WMQ dimensions and English writing performance. Data were collected from two independent samples of undergraduates from mainland China (N₁ = 173; N₂ = 368). Their English writing performance was assessed by their scores on the writing section of the National College English Test-Band 4. Confirmatory factor analyses and model comparisons suggested that an eight-factor correlated EFL-WMQ model fit the data best (i.e., intrinsic orientation, identified orientation, introjected orientation, external orientation, faciliating condition, writing self-efficacy, subjective norms, and growth mindset), and provided evidence of reliability, construct validity, and measurement invariance across gender. The hierarchical regression analyses indicated that intrinsic orientation, external orientation, writing self-efficacy, and growth mindset were significant predictors of English writing performance. The contributions and implications of the findings are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42622893What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.