ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Economic losses due to brucellosis and neosporosis abortions in Argentine beef herds.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Argentina, diseases that cause abortion pose a considerable threat to beef herds due to their economic implications. Previous research has shown variable results regarding their impact, primarily due to the different time points at which they were evaluated, leading to outdated findings, and due to a not accurate methodology. This study aims to quantify the economic losses due to abortions caused by brucellosis and neosporosis in Argentine beef herds. To calculate these losses, the cost per abortion was multiplied by the total number of abortions. The cost per abortion was determined using the Price Differential Method, comparing average prices of pregnant and non-pregnant cows during the months when abortions occur. To account for temporal fluctuations, the calculation spanned a 13-year period. The number of abortions was estimated considering the susceptible population, reproductive parameters, and the percentage attributable to each disease. The results indicated that the average cost per abortion was US$266.23 for brucellosis (range: 167.11 to 448.70) and US$245.71 for neosporosis (range: 159.63 to 413.07). At the national level, the average economic loss was US$1.46 million for brucellosis (range: 0.92 to 2.46 million) and US$1.62 million for neosporosis (range: 1.06 to 2.73 million). These costs were lower than those in other studies due to differences in methodologies and assumptions. This study enhances the estimation of the economic impact of abortions by recognizing that the value of these losses depends on changing market conditions over time and provides essential information to develop more effective strategies for their control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42622882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.