ArticlePituitary2026
Diagnostic value of the TRH test for central hypothyroidism in patients with pituitary and parasellar tumors: a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe utility and diagnostic interpretation of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) test for diagnose central hypothyroidism (CeH) remain unclear.
methodTo understand the significance of TRH testing for the diagnosis of CeH we reviewed the medical charts of 105 patients who underwent TRH test (200 µg) and analyzed TSH values and responses in three groups. Group 1, the control group, included 25 participants without pituitary and parasellar tumors (PPTs), and with normal pituitary function. Group 2, the CeH group, included 13 patients with PPTs and low free thyroxine (fT4) levels. Group 3 included 67 patients with PPTs but normal fT4 levels.
resultsBasal TSH levels did not significantly differ between Group 1 and Group 2. After TRH test, a peak TSH value and fold-TSH response were significantly lower in Group 2. Group 2 showed a higher rate of delayed and prolonged TSH responses and lower fold-free triiodothyronine (fT3) responses. We determined the cut-off values of fold-TSH, prolonged response, and fold-fT3 responses for diagnosing CeH patients with high sensitivity and specificity. Using two or more of these cut-off values further reduced the false-positive rate to 4%. Group 3 had a higher rate of positive results than Group 1, suggesting that there are patients with hidden CeH.
conclusionIn this study, we revealed that CeH can be diagnosed with a TRH test with a probability of more than 90%, and the test may be useful for diagnosing the CeH in patients with normal fT4 levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42622758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.