Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622748›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2026

Molecular active learning approaches for predicting skin cytotoxicity.

Sastiya Kampaengsri, Darlene Nabila Zetta, Andi Endang Kusuma Intan, Huynh Anh Duy, Tarapong Srisongkram

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sastiya KampaengsriDivision of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Darlene Nabila ZettaGraduate School in the Program of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Andi Endang Kusuma IntanFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School in the Program of Research and Development in Pharmaceuticals, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Huynh Anh DuyFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School in the Program of Research and Development in Pharmaceuticals, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Tarapong SrisongkramDivision of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. tarasri@kku.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8512-5379

Funding

This study was granted by the Post Doctoral Training Program for Frontier Research from Khon Kaen University, Thailand. 502568-02-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cytotoxicity assessment of small molecules is vital for assessing their risk of cytotoxicity upon topical contact. However, identifying cytotoxic compounds within vast chemical spaces is costly and time-consuming. In this study, we developed a data-efficient training approach to reduce the cost and time of cytotoxicity screening using an active deep learning framework. To mimic a real-world drug screening scenario, an experimental budget was imposed, allowing only a limited number of molecules to be selected from a large, unlabeled pool for cytotoxicity evaluation. A curated cytotoxicity dataset against keratinocytes was constructed. The active learning (AL) experiments were conducted using three deep learning (DL) models with seven different acquisition function strategies. From these experimental setups, we found that the self-supervised autoencoder acquired cytotoxic enrichments better than random chance and the other two baseline models. Secondly, we found that the top-k highest-probability acquisition function identified more new cytotoxic molecules than the other acquisition strategies. However, when measuring the diversity of acquired cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic molecules, we found that the novelty and diversity demonstrated the highest structural differences compared to other acquisition functions. Thirdly, we found that the overall cytotoxic enrichments from the best AL model (77.0 ± 4.0) are greater than those from baseline one-shot learning (71.3 ± 4.7), indicating that this AL method is useful for identifying more cytotoxic molecules. Next, we found that the AL model attains performance on par with a one-shot training approach that uses 100% of the pool data, while the AL model trained on only 16.6% of the pool data demonstrates a low data requirement for model training. Furthermore, we validated the predictive performance of the new AL model on cytotoxicity testing, exhibiting that the method is effective for prioritizing cytotoxic molecules in low-resource settings for drug design and development.

Indexed as

Active learningCytotoxicityDeep learningDrug discoveryMolecular diversity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.