Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622733›Full record

Observational studyHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

Parastomal hernia in the difficult patient: is Tophat plasty the solution?

Johnsen Tb, Stornes T, Bernstein Te

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johnsen TbDepartment of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Pb 3250 Torgarden, Trondheim, 7006, Norway. Tommy.B.Johnsen@stolav.no.
Stornes TDepartment of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Bernstein TeDepartment of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility and short- and long - term outcomes following the Tophat plasty - a complete extra-abdominal procedure - for parastomal hernia.

methodsA prospective observational single-center study including all patients operated with Tophat plasty at a regional tertiary referral university hospital in the period 2020-2024.

resultsTwenty- three patients were treated with the Tophat plasty. All procedures were performed by two surgeons. The median age was 70 years. Fifteen of the patients were males. Twelve patients had an ileal conduit, 7 had a colostomy and 4 had an ileostomy. The most common indication for surgery was obstruction, and three patients were operated in an acute setting. Medium operating time was 213 minutes. Two patients had recurrence after previous surgery for parastomal hernia. Three had concomitant incisional hernias. Ten patients had complications of which were registered according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The median hospital stay was 6 days, and median follow-up was 34 months. Three (13%) recurrences were identified, of which two (9%) needed intervention. 

conclusionThe Tophat plasty is an effective method for the treatment of parastomal hernias in cases where lateralization of the stoma is not feasible, intra-abdominal mesh placement has to be avoided, or when access to the abdominal cavity is challenging.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaSurgical StomasAgedAged, 80 and overColostomyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIleostomyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42622733
PMCPMC13493525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.