ArticleJournal of community health2026
Barriers, Facilitators, and Training Preferences for HIV PrEP Among Physicians in the State of Louisiana, USA.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV infection, yet its implementation remains suboptimal in the Southern United States. This study examined barriers, facilitators, and training preferences related to PrEP implementation among physicians at an academic medical center in North Louisiana. A cross-sectional electronic survey was conducted between January 2024 and April 2025 among physician faculty, residents, and fellows. Participants reported perceived barriers and facilitators to PrEP implementation, preferred training topics and modalities, and demographic characteristics. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, and linear regression identified factors associated with physicians' PrEP implementation training scores. The most commonly reported barriers were lack of provider training, insurance and cost-related concerns, lack of clinical protocols, staffing and time constraints, and limited knowledge of laboratory monitoring. Frequently identified facilitators included access to clinical protocols, peer support, pharmacist support, and electronic medical record (EMR) order sets. Physicians most frequently requested training on PrEP eligibility, side effects and toxicity, and contraindications, with in-person training as the preferred format. Physicians identified substantial educational and structural barriers to PrEP implementation despite strong support for institutional strategies that facilitate prescribing. Expanding physician education while integrating standardized protocols, pharmacist support, and EMR-based decision tools may strengthen PrEP implementation in high HIV-burden regions of the Southern United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42622727What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.