Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622675›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2026

Impact of a strategy using multiplex PCR on targeted antibiotic therapy for patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia or hospital-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation: a randomized, single-blind trial.

Guillaume Millot, Anahita Rouze, Frédéric Wallet, Caroline Loiez, Sébastien Preau, Côme Bureau, Nicolas Dognon, Alexandre Gaudet, Maxime Granier, Inès Gueguen and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Guillaume MillotDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Lille, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1296-8556
Anahita RouzeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Frédéric WalletService de Bactériologie Hygiène, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Caroline LoiezService de Bactériologie Hygiène, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Sébastien PreauDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Côme BureauDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Nicolas DognonDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Alexandre GaudetDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Maxime GranierIntensive Care Unit, Arras Hospital, Arras, France.
Inès GueguenRéanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France.
Julien LabreucheUniversity of Lille, ULR 2694 METRICS, Lille, France.
Léa MortainUniversity of Lille, ULR 2694 METRICS, Lille, France.
Saad NseirDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Lille, Lille, France. s-nseir@chru-lille.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-0357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (vHAP) are frequent in intensive care units and require prompt diagnosis. The FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (FAPP) enables fast pathogen identification, but its clinical impact remains uncertain.

objectiveTo assess whether adding FAPP to conventional microbiology increases the rate of targeted antimicrobial therapy (AMT) in patients with suspected VAP or vHAP.

methodOpen-label, multicenter randomized-controlled trial in immunocompetent adults with suspected VAP or vHAP. Patients were randomized to management with FAPP plus conventional microbiology or conventional microbiology alone. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving targeted AMT 24 h after inclusion.

resultsFrom June 2020 to September 2023, 156 patients were randomized; 146 were analyzed (74 intervention, 72 control), as 10 did not provide consent for continued participation. Median age was 58 years (interquartile range, 43-70), 67.8% were male, 84.9% had VAP, and mean SOFA score was 8.0 ± 3.5. Targeted AMT at 24 h was achieved in 35.1% of the experimental group versus 23.6% of the control group [absolute difference (AD), 11.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.03 to 26.2, p = 0.13]. Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly. Among patients with culture-documented pneumonia (45.9%), targeted AMT at 24 h was achieved in 55.3% versus 31.0%, respectively (AD, 24.2%; 95% CI, 1.1 to 47.4, p = 0.048).

conclusionAdding FAPP was not associated with a significant increase in targeted AMT at 24 h in patients with suspected VAP or vHAP, except in those with confirmed pneumonia.

Indexed as

Antibiotic stewardshipHospital-acquired pneumoniaMolecular diagnosticsSyndromic PCRVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.