SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
The effect of surgeon volume on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo synthesize, critically appraise and systematically review studies comparing outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed by low- vs. high-volume surgeons, and to propose evidence-based threshold definitions for these categories.
methodsThis review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. Medline and Embase were searched on March 24, 2025. Prospective and retrospective clinical studies were included if they reported THA thresholds for low- and high-volume surgeons. Articles not written in English or German were excluded. Outcomes were pooled and presented in forest plots. Methodological quality was assessed.
resultsOf 872 identified articles, 18 were included, reporting on 796,061 patients undergoing THA. Methodological quality was high in all studies (>6 of 7 points). Thresholds used to define high- vs. low-volume were determined using arbitrary values (n = 11), tertiles (n = 1), quartiles (n = 3), percentiles (n = 2), or receiver operating characteristic curves (n = 1). High-volume surgeons had significantly lower 1-month readmission rates [odds ratio (OR) = 1.6; p = 0.033] and 3-month mortality rates (OR = 1.8; p = 0.008). In contrast, there were no significant differences between high- and low-volume surgeons for 3-month revision rates (OR = 2.0; p = 0.228), 12-month revision rates (OR = 1.8; p = 0.228), and 3-month readmission rates (OR = 1.3; p = 0.337).
conclusionsThe included studies demonstrated considerable variability in the definitions of surgeon volume. However, there remains a trend suggesting that higher-volume surgeons experience fewer revisions, complications, readmissions, and mortality; although these differences were largely not statistically significant. Nonetheless, surgeon volume may not be the only factor influencing outcomes, as hospital and patient characteristics may influence short- to long-term outcomes following primary THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.