Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622662›Full record

ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy: from automated screening to risk-stratified care.

Fenfen Zhang, Panpan Shao, Dongdong Wei, Chunhua Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fenfen Zhang *Department of Ophthalmology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital Dezhou Hospital, Dezhou, 253000, China.
Panpan Shao *Department of Ophthalmology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital Dezhou Hospital, Dezhou, 253000, China.
Dongdong WeiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital Dezhou Hospital, Dezhou, 253000, China. yp98176@outlook.com.
Chunhua WangDepartment of General Practice, Shandong University Qilu Hospital Dezhou Hospital, Dezhou, 253000, China. wangchunhua198718@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness worldwide. The rising prevalence of diabetes has strained conventional screening pathways, which are labor-intensive and depend on specialist image interpretation, limiting access, particularly in resource-limited settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising approach to improve the scalability, consistency, and reach of DR detection and management. This review examines AI applications in DR, spanning automated screening, grading, lesion segmentation, multimodal imaging integration, personalized risk prediction, and AI-driven metabolomics, while also addressing translational challenges and future directions. We conducted a narrative review using major biomedical databases and targeted searches of peer-reviewed literature, prioritizing recent systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, implementation studies, and seminal technical reports. Current evidence shows that AI systems can detect referable DR with diagnostic performance approaching or exceeding expert human graders. Deep learning methods have improved lesion detection, severity grading, and risk assessment. Multimodal approaches integrating fundus photography with OCT, OCTA, and clinical data may enhance disease characterization and risk stratification, but most evidence remains developmental or early translational. Likewise, AI-guided personalized follow-up, treatment modeling, and metabolomics-based biomarker discovery are promising but less clinically validated than screening and grading applications. Real-world studies support implementation feasibility, with gains in screening uptake and workflow efficiency. Key barriers to broader adoption include external validation, heterogeneous reference standards, management of ungradable images, domain shift across devices and populations, workflow integration, and regulatory and ethical considerations. AI is poised to strengthen scalable DR care, but personalized applications require further validation before routine clinical use.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningDiabetic retinopathyMachine learningRetinal imagingRisk stratification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.