ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
Artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy: from automated screening to risk-stratified care.
Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness worldwide. The rising prevalence of diabetes has strained conventional screening pathways, which are labor-intensive and depend on specialist image interpretation, limiting access, particularly in resource-limited settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising approach to improve the scalability, consistency, and reach of DR detection and management. This review examines AI applications in DR, spanning automated screening, grading, lesion segmentation, multimodal imaging integration, personalized risk prediction, and AI-driven metabolomics, while also addressing translational challenges and future directions. We conducted a narrative review using major biomedical databases and targeted searches of peer-reviewed literature, prioritizing recent systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, implementation studies, and seminal technical reports. Current evidence shows that AI systems can detect referable DR with diagnostic performance approaching or exceeding expert human graders. Deep learning methods have improved lesion detection, severity grading, and risk assessment. Multimodal approaches integrating fundus photography with OCT, OCTA, and clinical data may enhance disease characterization and risk stratification, but most evidence remains developmental or early translational. Likewise, AI-guided personalized follow-up, treatment modeling, and metabolomics-based biomarker discovery are promising but less clinically validated than screening and grading applications. Real-world studies support implementation feasibility, with gains in screening uptake and workflow efficiency. Key barriers to broader adoption include external validation, heterogeneous reference standards, management of ungradable images, domain shift across devices and populations, workflow integration, and regulatory and ethical considerations. AI is poised to strengthen scalable DR care, but personalized applications require further validation before routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42622662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.