Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622651›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Unlocking forensic potential: machine learning-driven estimation of sex, age, and stature from proximal femur using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Phannavich Malawan, Kittichai Wantanajittikul, Sukon Prasitwattanaseree, Tawachai Monum, Apichat Sinthubua, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Phannavich MalawanDepartment of Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kittichai WantanajittikulDepartment of Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Sukon PrasitwattanasereeDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Tawachai MonumDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Apichat SinthubuaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Pasuk MahakkanukrauhDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. pasuk034@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0611-7552

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University 100/2568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beyond its clinical applications, Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) offers potential for forensic biological profiling, particularly in cases involving fragmented remains. This study establishes proof of concept for the use of DXA-derived variables, including Area, Bone Mineral Density (BMD), and Bone Mineral Content (BMC) across proximal femoral regions for the estimation of sex, age, and stature. Predictive performance was evaluated by directly comparing traditional baseline methods (Discriminant Function Analysis and stepwise regression) against various algorithmic approaches, including classical statistical models and modern Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. Feature importance analysis revealed that Area and BMC were the primary predictors for sex and stature, while BMD was critical for age estimation, consistent with age-related bone loss. For sex estimation, classical Logistic Regression (LR) outperformed the traditional Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) baseline, increasing accuracy from 90.7% to 93.4% while demonstrating minimal class-specific bias. In stature estimation, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) improved upon traditional stepwise regression, reducing the estimation error from 4.53 cm to 4.06 cm in the mixed-sex sample. When the sex-specific models were applied, stature estimation errors were 4.28 cm for males and 3.25 cm for females. For age estimation, traditional regression and GPR demonstrated comparable performance in the mixed-sex group (errors of 9.32 and 9.60 years). However, the models exhibited systematic bias at chronological extremes due to regression to the mean. To mitigate this, sex-specific modeling was employed to enhance prediction precision. This study affirms the proximal femur's potential as an effective "three-in-one" estimator when analyzed using DXA and demonstrates that the integration of optimized algorithms enhances overall predictive accuracy. These findings demonstrate the utility of DXA- and ML-based methods for future large-scale, population-specific forensic applications.

Indexed as

Age estimationForensic anthropologyMachine learningProximal femurSex estimationStature estimation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.