ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Unlocking forensic potential: machine learning-driven estimation of sex, age, and stature from proximal femur using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Beyond its clinical applications, Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) offers potential for forensic biological profiling, particularly in cases involving fragmented remains. This study establishes proof of concept for the use of DXA-derived variables, including Area, Bone Mineral Density (BMD), and Bone Mineral Content (BMC) across proximal femoral regions for the estimation of sex, age, and stature. Predictive performance was evaluated by directly comparing traditional baseline methods (Discriminant Function Analysis and stepwise regression) against various algorithmic approaches, including classical statistical models and modern Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. Feature importance analysis revealed that Area and BMC were the primary predictors for sex and stature, while BMD was critical for age estimation, consistent with age-related bone loss. For sex estimation, classical Logistic Regression (LR) outperformed the traditional Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) baseline, increasing accuracy from 90.7% to 93.4% while demonstrating minimal class-specific bias. In stature estimation, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) improved upon traditional stepwise regression, reducing the estimation error from 4.53 cm to 4.06 cm in the mixed-sex sample. When the sex-specific models were applied, stature estimation errors were 4.28 cm for males and 3.25 cm for females. For age estimation, traditional regression and GPR demonstrated comparable performance in the mixed-sex group (errors of 9.32 and 9.60 years). However, the models exhibited systematic bias at chronological extremes due to regression to the mean. To mitigate this, sex-specific modeling was employed to enhance prediction precision. This study affirms the proximal femur's potential as an effective "three-in-one" estimator when analyzed using DXA and demonstrates that the integration of optimized algorithms enhances overall predictive accuracy. These findings demonstrate the utility of DXA- and ML-based methods for future large-scale, population-specific forensic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42622651What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.