Observational studyJMIR nursing2026
Validation and Feasibility of a Consumer-Grade Wearable Sleep Monitoring Device and an Exploratory Evaluation of Sleep Characteristics and Associated Factors Among Nurses: Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in JMIR nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Shift work disorder and insufficient sleep are prevalent among nurses, leading to fatigue, reduced well-being, and potential safety concerns. The increasing use of wearable sleep-tracking devices presents an opportunity to evaluate nurses' sleep quality objectively. Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of wearable-based sleep monitoring and to obtain preliminary evidence of agreement with validated actigraphy among nurses. The secondary objective was to describe nurses' sleep characteristics and to examine exploratory associations between sociodemographic characteristics, shift patterns, sleep hygiene, and sleep parameters. Methods: A 2-phase feasibility observational cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. In phase 1, 5 nurses concurrently wore a consumer-grade, wrist-worn Apple Watch Series 10 and a validated actigraph (GENEActiv; ActivInsights Ltd) for 2 weeks. Preliminary agreement between the Apple Watch and GENEActiv was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients. Feasibility was determined through wear-time compliance and data completeness. In phase 2, 50 nurses working rotating or single shifts completed demographic and work-related questionnaires and the Sleep Hygiene Index. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine exploratory associations between selected covariates and sleep parameters, with adjustment for age, sex, BMI, parental status, workplace, total length of service, and sleep hygiene. Results: The Apple Watch showed preliminary evidence of agreement with GENEActiv for total sleep time, in-bed wake time, and sleep efficiency (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.95, 0.72, and 0.69, respectively), with high wear compliance and minimal missing data, supporting its feasibility for sleep monitoring. Mean total sleep time was 381 (SD 55) minutes, and mean sleep efficiency was 94.77% (SD 4.11%). Shift nurses reported poorer sleep hygiene than nonshift nurses; however, shift work status was not independently associated with sleep outcomes after adjustment. Higher BMI was associated with shorter total sleep time (unstandardized coefficient Conclusions: Apple Watch-based monitoring was feasible and showed preliminary agreement with actigraphy. Nurses slept less than recommended, and BMI and age were associated with sleep outcomes in exploratory analyses. These findings support larger studies and workplace strategies to improve sleep opportunity and healthy sleep behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.