ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Frequency of Depression Screening and Follow-Up Actions Among English Language Preference and Non-English Language Preference Adults in an Urban Family Medicine Clinic.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionDepression is a common mental health disorder in the United States and associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. We assessed the association between language preferences on the frequency of depression screenings and follow-up actions within a primary care setting.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients at a Federally Qualified Health Center in 2019. Our exposure was patient preference to use a non-English language. Our primary outcome was a completed annual depression screening. We also assessed follow-up actions after a positive depression screen. We used multivariable logistic regression to predict the odds of having a depression screening while adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity.ResultsAmong 10,187 patient encounters, 4,049 (39.8%) received depression screening. English-preference patients were significantly more likely to complete screenings compared to non-English-preference speakers (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.25; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.80-2.81). Compared to white patients, Black patients were less likely to complete a depression screening (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.88). Follow-up actions were documented in 31.3% of patients with English language preference and 23.5% of non-English language preference.ConclusionsPatients with English language preference were more likely to complete a depression screening and receive follow-up actions following a positive screen compared to those with non-English language preference. System-level interventions to improve equitable screening and follow-up are necessary in primary care. Collaborative care models, bilingual providers, and culturally tailored care may help reduce these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.