ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2026
Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of an animated educational tool for diabetic foot care: A randomized controlled trial and mixed-methods study in patients with active, in-remission and high-risk diabetic foot disease.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatients with diabetes have a 2% annual risk of developing a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Novel methods of reducing the risk of re-ulceration could reduce the cost of diabetic foot disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-two patients with active foot disease, a history of prior DFU and/or high-risk feet were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned 50:50 to be educated conventionally by a podiatrist or to view a bespoke foot self-care educational animation developed by the research team for this exploratory pilot study. A modified Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF) questionnaire was used to record knowledge of safe foot care behaviors pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was change in self-care knowledge score. In parallel, a mixed-methods acceptability study was carried out for the 26 patients in the intervention arm, with quantitative data obtained using a 20-item technology acceptance model. Qualitative data were obtained by face-to-face interviews in the clinic setting and examined using thematic analysis.
resultsWhile foot self-care knowledge scores were numerically higher in both groups, only the intervention group showed a statistically significant within-group improvement. There was a trend toward a greater magnitude of increase in the knowledge score in favor of the intervention group, but this did not reach statistical significance. Among the 26 patients who completed the technology acceptability study, the majority of responses were in favor of the educational video.
conclusionsThis randomized controlled and mixed-methods study demonstrated positive results in terms of improvements in foot self-care knowledge and acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.