Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622440›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Experience-Tuned Predictive Coding in Monocultural Brains: A Visual Mismatch Response Study.

Ginger Qinghong Zeng, Xue-Zhen Xiao, Yang Wang, Chun-Yu Tse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ginger Qinghong ZengDivision of Life Science and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Xue-Zhen XiaoDepartment of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yang WangDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chun-Yu TseDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaResearch Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous cultural categorization, mediated by automatic preattentive mechanisms, has been established in bicultural individuals through visual mismatch response (vMMR). However, how long-term monocultural experience shapes this process remains unexplored. Using vMMR, a neural index of prediction-error signaling, we found that predominantly monocultural Mainland Chinese exhibited a significant negative vMMR specifically to nondominant cultural deviants, while showing null responses to dominant cultural deviants. For Western participants, our primary analysis revealed no statistically significant vMMRs to both nondominant and dominant cultural deviants. Furthermore, exploratory regression analyses indicated that higher interdependent self-construal predicted a more positive vMMR to nondominant cultural deviants across both groups, suggesting a potential general role for this social-cognitive trait in modulating preattentive salience. No significant modulation effects were found for independent self-construal. These findings not only extend the phenomenon of automatic cultural change detection to predominantly monocultural brains but also provide preliminary evidence for experience-dependent neuroplasticity in predictive coding mechanisms, offering incremental advances in models of culture-cognition interactions.

Indexed as

BrainVisual PerceptionCognitionCultureFemaleHumansMalePhotic Stimulationcross‐cultureculture specificitymismatch responsepredictive codingself‐construal

Identifiers

PMID42622440
PMCPMC13492224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.